- John 9:35
-
- John 9:35
(KJV) Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when he had found him,
he said unto him, Dost thou believe on the Son of God?
(NWT-Jehovah‘s Witnesses) Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and,
on finding him, he said: “Are you putting faith in the Son of man?
(RSV) Jesus heard that they had cast him out, and having found him he
said, "Do you believe in the Son of man?"
(NRSV) Jesus heard that they had driven him out, and when he found him,
he said, ‘Do you believe in the Son of Man?’
(NAB-Roman Catholic) When Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, he
found him and said, "Do you believe in the Son of Man?"
(NIV) Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and when he found him,
he said, “Do you believe in the Son of Man?”
(NASB) Jesus heard that they had put him out, and finding him, He said,
"Do you believe in the Son of Man?"
(ESV) Jesus heard that they had cast him out, and having found him he
said, "Do you believe in the Son of Man?"
(HCSB) When Jesus heard that they had thrown the man out, He found him
and asked, "Do you believe in the Son of Man?"
(THE MESSAGE) Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and went and
found him. He asked him, "Do you believe in the Son of Man?"
Textus Receptus
hkousen o ihsouV oti exebalon auton
exw kai eurwn auton eipen autw su pisteueiV eiV ton uion tou qeou
Hort-Westcott
hkousen ihsouV oti exebalon auton exw
kai eurwn auton eipen su pisteueiV eiV ton uion tou anqrwpou
Effect
The word “Theou” (God) is changed to “anthropou” (man) in the following
corrupted manuscripts: Aleph (Sinaiticus), B (Vaticanus), D (Bezae
Cantabrigiensis 5th century), W (4-5th century), Both D & W manuscripts
contains the 4 Gospels and the Book of Acts alone.
The TR plainly calls Jesus the “Son of God” but the modern versions
reduce him to son of man. In the New Testament the term “Son of Man” is
used to describe the Lord Jesus 88 times in 84 verses so there is ample
allusion to this earthly title of the Lord Jesus Christ identifying Him
as coming in the flesh. The term “Son of God” is used 47 times in 46
verses. It is used ten times in the book of John, seven times in the
book of 1 John, and one time in the book of Revelation.
Some may ask, “what is the problem with the term “Son of Man?” Well
there is nothing wrong with that term since it is used copiously in the
New Testament but the problem is that in this particular verse, God did
not use the word for “man,” instead He originally used the word for
“God.” This word was surreptitiously changed for no reason expect
another attack on the deity of the Lord Jesus Christ. If you look at the
context in which this verse occurs, it is where Jesus had given sight to
the blind man. If you look in John 9:38, you will read a very important
clause:
(John 9:38 KJV) And he said, Lord, I
believe. And he worshipped him.
The man who received his sight was having a dialogue with the Lord Jesus
and the culmination of that dialogue was that the man had worshiped the
Lord Jesus.
(Rev 22:9 KJV) Then saith he unto
me, See thou do it not: for I am thy fellowservant, and of thy brethren
the prophets, and of them which keep the sayings of this book: worship
God.
In the context of this verse in Revelation John began to worship at the
feet of the angel who was showing him these things but the angel tells
him to worship God.
(Luke 4:8 KJV) And Jesus answered
and said unto him, Get thee behind me, Satan: for it is written, Thou
shalt worship the Lord thy God, and him only shalt thou serve.
Satan had tried to get the Lord Jesus Christ to worship him in exchange
for world domination but the Lord Jesus told him and told us that we are
to worship the Lord our God. Now back to John 9:35, if we follow the
modern versions and keep the changed term as “son of man,” then we will
have this man worshipping a mere human being. The modern versions keep
John 9:38 intact with the term “worship.” The problem with the context
of this dialogue in John 9 would look like this in the modern versions,
we will use the NIV.
John 9:35 (NIV) Jesus heard that they had thrown him out, and when he
found him, he said, “Do you believe in the Son of Man?”
John 9:38 (NIV) Then the man said, “Lord, I believe,” and he worshiped
him.
Jesus: Do you believe in the son of man?
Man: Lord I believe, and he worshiped him.
Instead of the man worshipping the Son of God, he would be worshipping
the son of man! A very, very, big difference! If God wrote “Theou”
(God), then it is to be translated and read “God” and not changed to
“man” by the Gnostic theologians of the second century nor endorsed by
the contemporary church. We see this principle of identification
revealed to us in Matthew 19:16-17:
(Mat 19:16-17 KJV) And, behold, one
came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I
may have eternal life? {17} And he said unto him, Why callest thou me
good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter
into life, keep the commandments.
This is the narrative of the Rich Young Ruler who came to Jesus and
called Him “Good Master.” Jesus rejected the title “Good Master” in this
dialogue, but why? The young ruler was looking at Him as a human being
and not as God. This is why Jesus said to Him that there is none good
except God.
(Rom 3:10-12 KJV) As it is written,
There is none righteous, no, not one: {11} There is none that
understandeth, there is none that seeketh after God. {12} They are all
gone out of the way, they are together become unprofitable; there is
none that doeth good, no, not one.
So by changing “God” to “man” we would be seeing the man worshipping
man.
(Rom 1:25 KJV) Who changed the truth
of God into a lie, and worshipped and served the creature more than the
Creator, who is blessed for ever. Amen.
Do you see how important just one word can be? Stick to the King James
and let the Lord bless you by giving you more understanding than those
who hold to the modern versions because some unbelieving scholar says
so. Don’t worship the creature, worship the Creator! The modern versions
have changed the truth of God into a lie!
- Corrupted Manuscripts
- This verse is corrupted in the following manuscripts:
- Aleph 01 - Sinaiticus - Fourth century
B 03 - Vaticanus - Fourth century
- D 05 - Bezae Cantabrigiensis - Fifth century
- W 032 - Fourth/fifth century
- P 66 - circa 200 AD
- P 75 - Third century
-