Cultic Parallels
(Hab 2:2-3 KJV) And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it. {3} For the vision is yet for an appointed time, but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will surely come, it will not tarry.
Now if it was a prophecy of the book 1994?, then the Lord would have returned on that date. To say that the Book 1994? is prophesied in Scripture is to say that the Bible contains errors since the prophecy did not come to pass. Based upon this persons premise, should the Book 1994? be added to the Canon? These Campingites are so obsessed with their leader, they have begun to find him in Scripture. This is an open sign of a Cult, where the leader is adulated to the point of deity. This is a portion of a the post which is a much longer one.
I think I can say with some degree of certainty that, Mr. Camping would not have
written 1994? if all though time paths did not exist. His conclusion was that it was the
end of the world, and of course that conclusion was incorrect.
I submit 1994? was prophesy fulfilled. Every time God brought judgment in the past He not
only told the people He was going to do it, but He told them when. Its a Biblical
principle. God always warns the people.
Mr. Camping in 1994 sounded the alarm. (I believe this was a fulfillment of the prophecy
in Habakkuk 2)
Habakkuk 2:2 And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon
tables, that he may run that breadth it. 3 For the vision is yet for an appointed time,
but at the end it shall speak, and not lie: though it tarry, wait for it; because it will
surely come, it will not tarry.
The word "vision" in verse 2 is the Hebrew word for revelation. The watch man
was told to write something that he understood about the end time, and to make it plain on
tablets, that he who reads it may go and tell others. The Bible, by no means is written
plain, anything but. Therefore it cannot be referring to the Bible as some have said.
It therefore can only be referring to a commentary written about the end time. Many such
commentaries have been written, but only the "true" one it is in view.
At the point 1994 was sounded the tarry begin. So the question is what happened in 1994.
Did judgment begin on the church, or was it the warning that judgment was coming? Because
God always gives warning!
The word for vision in Habakkuk 2:2, is not the direct word for revelation. The word chazon means a vision which can indicate a reference to a revelation from God. Is this person also telling us that 1994? was a revelation from God? By stating that Habakkuk is speaking about an outside future commentary, and that being the book 1994?, he is stating that God endorses a book of false prophecies. In other words, in his mind, God is endorsing a lie. (Rom 3:4 KJV) God forbid: yea, let God be true, but every man a liar; as it is written, That thou mightest be justified in thy sayings, and mightest overcome when thou art judged.
Now this is a cultic attitude because if the book 1994? was prophesied by God in Scripture, then we have a problem. If the end of the world was supposed to happen in 1994, and it didnt, then this was the first time God was wrong and that would also mean the Scriptures would be corrupt. To equate the book 1994? with prophesy in Scripture is a blasphemy. These people that follow Harold Camping cannot see beyond their own blindness because they are blind to it.